![il class actio naacp commonality il class actio naacp commonality](https://s28543.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2020/11/Screen-Shot-2020-11-17-at-8.21.57-PM-2048x1280.jpg)
The lawyers said they would be seeking UPS records as the case moves toward a trial in a year or two.
![il class actio naacp commonality il class actio naacp commonality](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/naacpact-somasterclass71115-150713152559-lva1-app6892/95/naacp-actso-master-class-2015-naacp-convention-18-1024.jpg)
NAACP lawyers declined to discuss their evidence when asked what, if anything, top UPS managers might have known about the disputes. The union said assignments were handed out on the basis of seniority. Some black UPS employees said their union, Teamsters Local 70, had not backed up their complaints about work assignments. The complaint alleges that he was denied promotions because of biased testing and discriminatory bidding practices. A non-African American worker was responsible for the crime but was not fired or even accused, the suit states.Īt the news conferences, Oakland driver Tim Mapfumo said he had been called racist names by supervisors and lied to by the company. In 1990, according to the suit, he was fired without cause for allegedly participating in a theft he says he did not commit. Paden's account is similar to that of Jeffrey Wynn, a loader based in Riverside. "I'm sick and tired of having guns put in my face - sick and tired of being treated as a suspect instead of a victim," said Paden, who attended an NAACP news conference yesterday in the rotunda of the Oakland Federal Building. But, the complaint states, nonblack drivers were not treated with suspicion when property under their control was lost or stolen. SUSPECT TREATMENTĬompany officials assumed that Marlon Lynn Paden, a driver based in Oakland and one of the 16 plaintiffs named in the suit, was the principal suspect after he had been held up on the job, according to the suit. Many said they had been denied promotions and favorable assignments - specifically, that they had been given routes in high- crime areas and that the company had treated them as suspects when they were robbed or when packages were missing. Meanwhile, UPS employees in Seattle, Sacramento, Ontario and San Bernardino came forward with similar allegations.Įventually, the NAACP's lawyers - Robert Chan and the firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann and Bernstein, both of San Francisco - developed the complaint from the accounts of more than 200 workers. The NAACP later expanded the investigation to include other Oakland-based UPS workers. The investigation began when four UPS workers at the company's Oakland hub told an NAACP committee that they had been discriminated against because of their race and that neither the company nor their union had done anything about it. The suit is the culmination of a yearlong investigation by the Oakland branch of the NAACP.
![il class actio naacp commonality il class actio naacp commonality](https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/NAACP_LogoBW.jpg)
"UPS does not tolerate discrimination of any kind," company spokesman Tom Pizzuti said. UPS said it had been looking into the allegations since they were first made last year.